Tucker Carlson, an outspoken truth-teller, is receiving a lot of appreciation for confronting and thoroughly dismantling the flagrant falsehoods and bullshit from an Australian reporter.
Australian journalists likewise enjoy lying, obfuscating, and misleading, just like their American counterparts do. Indeed, at a speech this week in Canberra, this much was evident as day.
By entirely misrepresenting and distorting what Carlson had previously said, Kat Wong of the Australian Associated Press attempted to paint Carlson as a white nationalist or white supremacist during the event.
Starting at 17:30:
Meet the Australian media. pic.twitter.com/IyiEqihPkb
— Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) June 26, 2024
“You’ve previously discussed the Great Replacement Theory, which holds that non-white immigrants are raising white Americans, Europeans, and Australians,” Wong stated.
Carlson signaled a foul correctly and promptly.
Is the replacement of white people underway? I may not have said that. He asked her to provide a specific example of his concerns about the demographic replacement of white people. “When did I propose the replacement of whites?” he questioned.
He proceeded to destroy her when she was unable to respond.
He said, “I’m very sure I haven’t stated that.” “I asserted that native-born Americans, including those of African descent, are experiencing displacement. Similar to black Americans, Americans whose families have resided in the country for more than 400 years are also being replaced.
“To me, their worries are just as genuine, legitimate, and urgent as those of white individuals whose families have been in this country for 400 generations. Thus, not a single time have I claimed that white people are disappearing. You can’t cite it either,” he continued.
He continued by criticizing Wong personally for being a flagrant liar.
He said, “We just met, yet it’s hard to be friends when our relationship starts with a lie.” You really can’t reference it because, as I’m telling you to your face, I didn’t say it and I don’t believe it. Why don’t you take my word for it?
She works as a journalist, and those who identify as journalists frequently face humiliation and navigate a world filled with lies and illusions.
In response, Carlson said it is “immoral” for leaders to prioritize illegal aliens over “the people whose obligation it is to take care of,” or Americans.
Then, he acknowledged that “the economy” is the reason Americans don’t have as many children as they used to, but he made it clear that improving the economy is the key to the problem rather than “importing people from other nations.”
“You don’t just import new people to get your sugar rush,” he remarked. That’s where I stand. If you think that’s racist, that’s your problem.
Wong said, “I never called you a racist,” and she kept lying.
Tucker shot out, “But of course, you are recommending it.” “You never explain exactly what you mean, which is one of the reasons people hate individuals like you in the media, I must say.”
Verify the facts: THIS IS TRUE!
“Your insults are all implicit,” he went on. You’re likely to accuse me of racism, antisemitism, or any other offense against the Great Replacement Theory. I’ve probably said what I’m saying to you in public a hundred times already. If I live long enough, I want to say it one hundred more times. It’s not intimidating or racist, in my opinion; it’s just pure honesty and reality. In actuality, it is accurate. It is a fact rather than an idea.
What was Wong’s response? Wong responded by attributing multiple mass shootings to the hypothesis. Carlson became irate and yelled, “COME ON” in response.
Then he questioned, “How can they get people this ignorant in the media? I suppose the pay isn’t that great. I apologize, I’ve spent much too much time with folks just like you. I’m not trying to call you foolish, perhaps you’re simply acting that way. However, I strongly oppose violence. For example, I completely oppose the conflict in Ukraine, which you presumably support and which, like all decent liberals, calls for even more bloodshed. No, I don’t.”
“To be honest, I detest mass shootings. I said nothing that would motivate anyone. My opinions do not discriminate against any group. They are truthful. They are true. That is reality, not hate. My opinions are based on my genuine concern for Americans. Because they cannot afford it, Americans do not have children, and no one in authority seems to care. That’s where I stand, then. It doesn’t encourage widespread shootings. You have no right to associate me with a psychopath who has killed people. Really, how dare you? He continued.
Wong continued to act like the stereotypical journalist, making it difficult for most people to predict her next question.
“So you’re in favor of gun control, then?” She asked.
Say what?
Carlson obliterated Wong and the other reporters, damaging their entire careers, and the back-and-forth debate proceeded in this manner for the remainder of the exchange.
After this back-and-forth conversation, social media fans showered Carlson with compliments for a job extremely well done.
