Chuck Schumer Has A Nervous Breakdown About This Video Release

I’ve been writing about the hysteria that some members of the Jan. 6 Committee are exhibiting in response to the countless hours of video that House Speaker Kevin McCarthy gave Tucker Carlson and his team access to. Why would they be so furious if others saw the video or learned more about what happened that day? Isn’t that what they incessantly claimed to want? However, all of a sudden, we witness them breaking down and positing numerous arguments as to why shedding more light on the matter is so detrimental.
 

Some of the Committee members, including Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), former Rep. Adam Kinzinger, and Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), all lost their cool and began to act out. Carlson allegedly pushed “Kremlin talking points” and would advance conspiracy theories, according to Schiff, the man who advocated a variety of Russian collusion illusions. Without providing an explanation as to why exposing the facts is harmful or why his Committee chose not to release the video material, Kinzinger reprimanded McCarthy for sharing it with Carlson rather than the rest of Congress or investigators. Raskin managed to contradict himself by stating that the publication might jeopardize security and then asking why it wasn’t made available to the general public. Then he asserted that divulging further details about what transpired would encourage “MAGA propaganda.” You could sense how terrified everyone is of what viewers might see in the video.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has since joined them and is in a complete state of terror. How badly is he going crazy? Chuck compared opening up the events of January 6 to the public to 9/11. I am not joking. Continue reading to hear Schumer complain about how McCarthy is “unnecessarily exposing” the Capitol to “one of the worst security concerns since 9/11.”

It is absurd to say that giving the film to Tucker Carlson is comparable to the events of September 11th. The suffering endured by Americans on that day is demeaning and undervalued. I understand that Chuck is always political, but coming from a senator from New York, that is particularly awful to say. Additionally, he asserted that the “Senate” is opposed to its distribution. Chuck, I didn’t see anyone cast a ballot there. You don’t speak for the entire Senate when you speak.

Democrats are using any argument they can think of to try to discredit the release and anything that might be revealed. Why not release all of the material that doesn’t have an impact on security? They released the footage they wanted to share through the Committee that suited their political goal. We have a right to view it since it is our Congress. Despite the fact that people like Schumer may believe otherwise, they work for us and not the other way around.

Let’s talk about the security measures that Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), the House Speaker at the time, helped implement but which utterly failed that day. Given that it failed, shouldn’t we be interested in learning more about how to make it better? However, the Jan. 6 Committee’s political agenda and attempts to undermine President Donald Trump were its main goals.

But if what Tucker Carlson claimed is accurate, it appears like Schumer and the rest of his gang will have more tantrums. He claimed that some of the things they’ve previously seen conflict with what we’ve been told. So when they continue to examine the film, get ready for more meltdowns when Carlson explains it next week.

Author: Blake Ambrose

Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More